[Templates] Re: TT in Python

[Josh Rosenbaum]

Sean McAfee wrote:
> On 3/15/07, *Johan Vromans* <jvromans@squirrel.nl 
> <mailto:jvromans@squirrel.nl>> wrote:
>     "Sean McAfee" <eefacm@gmail.com <mailto:eefacm@gmail.com>> writes:
>      > I guess I'm about ready to put a lot more eyes on it, if there's any
>      > interest. So, is there?
> 
>     I'm not a Python user so I may not be your target audience, but I
>     think it is a very good thing to have alternative implementations for
>     the TT language (note that I use 'language'; this is slightly
>     different from the TT processor).
> 
>     But PLEASE stay in sync with the TT specs.
> 
> 
> I'm willing to put in the effort to do so, at least for the near term.
> 
> So, um... Anyone else?

As long as it follows specs along with changes to the specs, it is increasing adoption and portability of TT. That seems like a good thing to me.

Can't say I'm interested in the Python version for actual use currently, though.

-- Josh