[Templates] Proposed patch for truncate()

[Clinton Gormley]

> Obviously we don't want to go changing the order of the first two
> parameters because it'll break existing code.  But tagging the min
> parameter on the end feels pretty wrong too.  It's not very intuitive
> or obvious as to why it's that way (other than "backwards compatibility").


Yup, I agree
> So I think I'll have to pass on the patch this time, but keep the basic
> idea.  Thank you for your efforts, all the same.

makes sense

thanks

clint